Have a feature request or suggestion? Post your idea here!

Post

4 Follower Folgen
0
Avatar

Sound quality difference between the CDJ-2000NSX2 vs CDJ-900NXS?

Using the example a new WAV file from Beatport does either player produce a more accurate sound quality reproduction than the other? 
(CDJ-2000NSX2 VS CDJ-900NXS)

 

The THD on the 2000NXS2 is < 0.018 % (JEITA)

The THD on the 900NXS is .< 0.003 % (JEITA)

 

And a second question:

 

Forgive my ignorance is the lower percentage an indication of less distortion or more?

Thank you.

 

movingzachb Beantwortet

Offizieller Kommentar

Avatar

The CDJ-2000 line uses a WOLFSON DAC, which I'm told is a higher quality than the DAC used in the CDJ-900 line. If you can hear the difference in a blind test, you've got better hearing than 99.999% of the population!

Pulse
Aktionen für Kommentare Permalink

Post ist für Kommentare geschlossen.

5 Kommentare

0
Avatar

I believe that, technically, a lower value means less distortion. I'm guessing the additional electronic components inside the CDJ-2000NXS2 are the catalyst for the increased THD value, however, you would have to have superhuman hearing to hear any degradation in output as a result of THD. Furthermore, using the CDJ-2000NXS's SPDIF output would enable you to achieve bit-perfect output (assuming you're using a mixer like the DJM-900NXS2 with values set to 24bit/96k)...so if you're after "best" quality in terms of minimal audio signal conversion (D/D vs. D/A) the NXS2 is what you're after. Hope this helps.

lostnthesound 0 Stimmen
Aktionen für Kommentare Permalink
0
Avatar

The newest CDJ and DJM use AKM DACs which are currently very in-vogue.  The earlier CDJ-900 & 2000 models used Wolfson.  I think they all sound fine.  Probably the opamps have more to do with their sound than the actual DACs.  If you use a digital output, at zero pitch they are bit-perfect.

Reticuli 0 Stimmen
Aktionen für Kommentare Permalink
0
Avatar

I am currently using a XONE:92 mixer as it is just my preference. I don't think there is any way to use the digital outputs with it. The CDJ-2000 and CDJ-900 Nexus both use Wolfson DACs. Are they not the exact same Woflson DAC version in each? Or are you saying they are different?

movingzachb 0 Stimmen
Aktionen für Kommentare Permalink
0
Avatar

The mk1 2000 and 900 both use Wolfsons, just slightly different models with the 900 having a 48khz one and the 2000 using a 96khz DAC.  The 900's was the same as on the CDJ-1000mk3.

You're correct, the Xone 92 is an analog mixer and you will be making use of the DACs on the players to go into it.

I should also mention that just because the Pioneer players are bit-perfect out the SPDIF with the pitch at zero does not mean a digital mixer can treat it as bit-perfect.  All digital mixers alter the data a little bit (or a lot), depending on the model, no matter what you do on the mixer.

Reticuli 0 Stimmen
Aktionen für Kommentare Permalink