Because it says while inheriting the audio circuit from the CDJ-2000 then goes on to say what it is. So is this basically saying - it has the same 'powerful clear sound' as the CDJ-2000? Help me out here please with my poor reading comprehension.
Post
FolgenCDJ-2000 Nexus vs CDJ-2000 are these two features missing in the 2000?
High sound quality design for faithful reproduction of original tone and clear/powerful club sound
While inheriting the audio circuit from the “CDJ-2000”, this new device delivers a powerful sound that is stable even in high-volume environments such as DJ booths by means of improved anti-shock properties and reduced contact resistance through the adoption of a type of AC inlet that has a large power cable contact area. A clear and powerful sound that is faithful to the original has also been realized by reducing jitter to 1/4 through the high-precision engineered clock of a high-performance D/A converter produced by Wolfson Microelectronics, adoption of a high sound quality operational amplifier, and digital noise reduction of power sources.
A new algorithm has been adopted to deliver sound quality that is more faithful to the original tone, even when there are drastic shifts in tempo during playback of wide-ranging music. This enables high-quality mix playback even when there is a big difference in track tempo.
Post ist für Kommentare geschlossen.
6 Kommentare
No, those features aren't 'missing' from the original CDJ2000 - they've been updated in the Nexus, thats all.
So does the nexus have an edge in sound quality over the 2000?
Yes, I believe the circuitry is actually different. I'll double check.
No answer Gavin, until now?
@Cristian > Yes, there is a difference.