Have a feature request or suggestion? Post your idea here!

Post

5 Follower Folgen
0
Avatar

Cdjs Latency RKBX 4.0

I understand this is version 4.0 ... but im trying to help the devs here
HID latency is pretty bad at the moment ... even if adjusted to 2.5 ms its still choppy,laggy

DJBM

Post ist für Kommentare geschlossen.

15 Kommentare

0
Avatar

I believe the latency was optimized with the new DDJ RZ and RX.... because with CDJs it is awful. I just tried using 4x CDJs and a DJM900 and it is pretty much unusable.

Christian Jackson 0 Stimmen
Aktionen für Kommentare Permalink
0
Avatar

Which CDJ's are you using? What type of mixer are you using? What do you have the sample rate/buffer set to?

lostnthesound 0 Stimmen
Aktionen für Kommentare Permalink
0
Avatar

FWIW, I have no noticeable latency with a 2 x XDJ-1000 + DJM-900 setup (Mac OSX Yosemite, MBP 15" Retina)

lostnthesound 0 Stimmen
Aktionen für Kommentare Permalink
0
Avatar

im not using a usb hub , the set up is 1CDJ2000NXS 1DJM900SRT i think im at 2.2 or 2.5 for the latency

DJBM 0 Stimmen
Aktionen für Kommentare Permalink
0
Avatar

Hmmm...that is strange. Do you have a high waveform redrawing rate set in your preferences?

lostnthesound 0 Stimmen
Aktionen für Kommentare Permalink
0
Avatar

Try disabling that and see if makes a difference. It's a longshot, but aside from adjusting the sample rate/buffer settings, you may have to wait for @Pulse to chime in. Do you happen to notice if the CPU meter maxes out while you're using Rekordbox DJ in HID?

lostnthesound 0 Stimmen
Aktionen für Kommentare Permalink
0
Avatar

I'd suggest it might be the redraw but a MPB + Retina should be newer than what I'm running and I have no latency issues on a pair of CDJ350's here.

Pulse 0 Stimmen
Aktionen für Kommentare Permalink
1
Avatar

Yeah, thats my video. I've even tried this with only one CDJ connected with no files being analysed and CPU usage under 20%. But the lag still exists.

Christian Jackson 1 Stimme
Aktionen für Kommentare Permalink
0
Avatar

Latency is definitely bad with the platter, i see this too.

BriChi 0 Stimmen
Aktionen für Kommentare Permalink
0
Avatar

I'm not sure why anyone who has a CDJ2000Nexus would ever use the plus pack, just saying. If you're looking for FX, the rmx is available. aside from that, nothing else is dramatically different..

Tu Tran 0 Stimmen
Aktionen für Kommentare Permalink
0
Avatar

I agree, built more for controllers in mind. Once nice feature i like is you can scroll though your laptop library now via the CDJ knob

BriChi 0 Stimmen
Aktionen für Kommentare Permalink